VCs are taking on operator roles. Why?
Sifted
Some European VCs are now running startups while still investing in them, not switching sides entirely. Judith Dada and Carmen Alfonso Rico are the latest to blend both jobs at once, and it raises real conflict-of-interest questions.
Based on reporting by Sifted — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
There's a specific flavour of career move quietly spreading through European venture capital right now, and it's not the usual one. VCs going operator isn't new — plenty have quit their firms to run a startup, and plenty more have stepped into interim CEO roles at portfolio companies during a rough patch before handing the reins back. What's different this time is the hybrid: keeping the investor title and the operator title at once, permanently, not as a stopgap.
Judith Dada is the clearest example. She's a general partner at Visionaries, and this month she also became co-CEO at Langdock, an AI startup her firm has backed. She's not stepping down from investing to do it. Carmen Alfonso Rico, who founded the London-based angel fund Cocoa, made a similar leap, joining British chip startup Fractile as VP of business operations while staying on as an active investor. Both are effectively wearing two hats that used to be considered mutually exclusive in most VC contracts.
Sifted's Freya Pratty and Anne Sraders dug into why this is happening now, and the timing isn't random. Visionaries itself is going through a broader shift, with several partners moving from full-time investing into more entrepreneurial, hands-on roles inside the companies they've funded. That's a structural signal, not just two isolated career choices. When a firm's own partners start blurring the line between backer and builder, it suggests something about how thin the talent pool is, or how much conviction these investors have in specific bets — or both.
The obvious tension nobody's glossing over is governance. A GP who's also a co-CEO is negotiating term sheets, board seats and follow-on rounds with themselves sitting on both sides of the table. Limited partners who wired money expecting arm's-length judgment might have questions about whose interests get prioritised when a founder needs tough feedback or a down round gets discussed. Sraders and Pratty flag this as the thing to watch as the trend spreads rather than a one-off curiosity.
Whether this becomes a normalised path in European VC or fizzles out as a handful of high-conviction bets depends on how these hybrid arrangements perform over the next 18 months. If Langdock or Fractile stumble, LPs will start asking pointed questions about incentive alignment. If they thrive, expect a lot more GPs quietly asking their partners for permission to do the same.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
I'll say the unfashionable thing: this is a governance problem wearing a founder-friendly costume. Sure, deep operational involvement can help a portfolio company, but LPs didn't sign up for their fund managers to also be the ones grading their own homework, and pretending otherwise because the AI hype cycle rewards hustle is exactly the kind of blurred incentive Europe's smaller, less institutionalised VC scene can't really afford right now.
Read more about this at: Sifted
Related stories
Portfolio review takes on a new urgency for VCs as AI makes 2024's great deals look like 2026's clear mistakes
Fortune ·
29