A tech podcast inspired AI workers to donate $40 million to improve the lives of chickens, pigs, and other factory-farmed animals
Fortune Preston Fore
AI industry money is landing on an unlikely cause: farm animals. About $40M went to their welfare this year — sparked by one podcast chat, turned into checks within days.
Based on reporting by Fortune, Preston Fore — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
Somewhere between OpenAI's cafeteria and a podcast studio, a new philanthropic habit took shape. Lewis Bollard, who has spent a decade running farm animal welfare work at Coefficient Giving, says donors connected to the AI industry have put roughly $40 million toward improving conditions for chickens, pigs and other factory-farmed animals this year alone. Bollard describes a shift in mentality among younger AI workers, who seem far more willing to just sign a million-dollar check than previous generations of wealthy donors ever were.
Much of this traces back to a single conversation. Bollard appeared on Dwarkesh Patel's podcast in August 2025, and the two argued that billions of animals live in extreme confinement while the cause gets a sliver of the philanthropic attention that climate change or global health receive. Patel didn't just talk about it. He launched a fundraising push for FarmKind, a nonprofit donation platform focused on ending factory farming, backing it with a $250,000 matching pledge that got claimed in under two days — much faster than FarmKind's cofounder Thom Norman expected. Patel and Bollard then started hosting informal dinners at AI companies, including OpenAI, to talk animal welfare with employees. The FarmKind campaign alone pulled in $2.3 million, and repeat donors have since added another $200,000, with more still coming in.
The scale of what's coming makes this look like an early tremor. U.S. charitable giving hit a record $617.2 billion in 2025, per the Giving USA Foundation, and Forbes reports the AI boom could eventually push roughly $300 billion in new wealth into philanthropy, fueling about $30 billion in annual donations down the line. What's different this time is the timeline: many younger founders and employees appear to want to give substantial sums now, not decades from now after building a fortune and retiring.
That eagerness shows up beyond the checkbook. A 2024 Bank of America Private Bank survey of people with more than $3 million in investable assets found donors under 43 slightly more likely to volunteer their time, twice as likely to rally donations from friends, and more than four times as likely to mentor others in giving. For a cause that Norman says has historically had less annual global funding than McDonald's makes in two weeks of profit, that kind of engagement — money plus peer pressure plus mentorship — could matter as much as the dollar figures.
Not everyone in tech is convinced that money alone solves anything. Elon Musk has repeatedly said giving effectively is one of the hardest problems he's faced, telling the WTF podcast it's easy to give money for the appearance of goodness and very difficult to give it for the reality of it. Peter Thiel has gone further, saying he's encouraged Giving Pledge signers, including Musk, to walk back their commitments, and he's called the Pledge an Epstein-adjacent, fake Boomer club in comments to The New York Times. Liz Baker, CEO of Greater Good Charities, put it more plainly: the hard part isn't finding a cause worth funding, it's handling the responsibility that comes with giving away serious money.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
placeholder
Read more about this at: Fortune