98% of startup leaders believe communications can accelerate fundraising, yet only 35% use it that way
Startups Magazine Marina Levina
Startups say comms can speed up fundraising, but most still don’t use it that way. AI is making pitches louder and more alike, so trust is becoming the real edge.
Based on reporting by Startups Magazine, Marina Levina — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
Generative AI has made it cheap and easy for startups to crank out pitches, posts, and investor updates. The catch is that everyone can do that now. When the same tools are available to everyone, the thing that separates a serious founder from noise is credibility, not volume.
That’s the core message from Wonders and Blunders of PR & Communications in the Age of AI, a WISH study based on more than 100 startups, from pre-seed companies to unicorns, plus input from around 40 investors, journalists, Microsoft for Startups, and other ecosystem figures. The numbers show a strange gap. About 98% of respondents think strong PR and communications can help startups raise money faster, but only 35% actually use communications for that purpose.
Startups are still treating comms more like branding than fundraising infrastructure, even though nearly one-third of respondents say communications can drive up to half of investor awareness and the next funding round. Investors read those updates differently. They see a pattern, a level of honesty, and whether the founder can explain the company without hiding behind polish.
That matters even more because 95% of the startups surveyed already use AI in communications. The efficiency is real, but so are the side effects: 64% pointed to a loss of personal touch and authenticity, 62% to weaker critical thinking, and 54% to messaging that starts to sound the same. Microsoft for Startups’ Ran Wei Baker said AI can help stretched teams scale their output, but founders still need to review it and make sure it sounds like them.
The other big mistake is timing. Seventy-five percent of startups wait until they have traction or revenue before speaking publicly, while only 18% think communications should begin at the pre-seed stage. Investors, meanwhile, often start watching long before a raise. As Uday Khanna of 1406 Park Lane Partners VC put it, regular updates build accountability and trust. In other words: don’t wait until you need money to start acting visible.
The useful rule here is simple. Let AI handle research, drafting, and scale. Let humans handle judgment, claims, and the actual relationship. That’s not a temporary workaround. It’s the job.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
Founders keep using AI to make comms faster, then act surprised when nobody trusts the result. That’s not a tech problem; that’s a judgment problem with a nicer interface. The market is already drowning in competent-sounding sludge, so the boring habit of speaking early and speaking honestly is suddenly the premium feature.
Read more about this at: Startups Magazine
Related stories
Portfolio review takes on a new urgency for VCs as AI makes 2024's great deals look like 2026's clear mistakes
Fortune ·
29
Bootstrapping, AI, "building for a flip": Central European VCs have their say
Tech.eu · 5 days ago ·
28