Beyond tree cover: mapping the world’s forest types
Google DeepMind made a global map that tells forest types apart at 10-meter detail. It also shows year-by-year change, so you can see what replaces a forest, not just that it vanished.
Based on reporting by Google — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
Google DeepMind, Google Research, WRI and IIASA have released ForTy 2020, a global forest map that classifies every 10-by-10-meter patch of land into six types. The pitch is simple, but the point is big: a green pixel is not always a forest, and not every forest stores the same carbon or supports the same wildlife.
The map splits land into primary forest, naturally regenerating forest, planted forest, plantation forest, tree crops and agroforestry, and everything else. That matters for rules like the EU’s deforestation regulation, which cares not just about where forest once stood, but what it became afterward. Coffee, cocoa and palm oil are one issue; wood products are another, because degradation counts too.
ForTy goes beyond a single snapshot. Alongside the 2020 baseline, the team is also publishing an early time series from 2017 through 2025 that shows what changed each year, including cases where natural forest was turned into plantation or farm land. That is the bit standard tree-cover maps miss, especially when a logged area quickly turns green again.
Training the model took 1.7 million labeled locations gathered from expert surveys, regional and national datasets, and targeted checks on hard cases. The system also uses AlphaEarth Foundations embeddings, which package years of satellite observations for each 10-meter pixel so it can catch clues like planting patterns, harvest rhythms and growth cycles.
To see if it held up, the researchers tested ForTy against more than 9,000 randomly chosen sites worldwide. Two trained experts reviewed each site using high-resolution imagery and satellite history. The result: the model got forest type right 90% of the time and forest versus non-forest right 95% of the time, which Google says beats other global forest maps. The data are now free on Google Earth Engine under an open license.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
This is the right kind of AI climate work: boring on the surface, useful in practice, and annoyingly harder than the splashy demos. Tree cover maps have been a convenient lie for too long. If regulation is going to police forest loss, it needs to stop pretending every green square is the same green square.
Read more about this at: Google