Physical AI Top 40

The same momentum score, restricted to companies with robotics coverage or a tracked real-world deployment — humanoids, warehouse robots, autonomous vehicles and drones.

Snapshot of week of 19 Oct 2026 other weeks: 9 Nov 2 Nov 26 Oct 19 Oct 12 Oct 5 Oct 28 Sep 21 Sep 14 Sep 7 Sep 31 Aug 24 Aug 17 Aug 10 Aug 3 Aug

# Δ Company Score
1 — OpenAI
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 37 in window · 27% of score
  • Coverage · 514 in window · 16% of score
  • Funding activity · 5 in window · 16% of score
100
2 — Anthropic
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 33 in window · 38% of score
  • Event involvement · 70 in window · 19% of score
  • Coverage · 292 in window · 15% of score
64
3 — Google
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 29 in window · 36% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 7 in window · 27% of score
  • Event involvement · 52 in window · 15% of score
60
4 — Meta
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 30 in window · 49% of score
  • Relationship growth · 121 in window · 15% of score
  • Coverage · 190 in window · 13% of score
45
5 — NVIDIA
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 21 in window · 44% of score
  • Relationship growth · 144 in window · 23% of score
  • Event involvement · 39 in window · 20% of score
35
6 — Microsoft
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 19 in window · 55% of score
  • Event involvement · 25 in window · 17% of score
  • Relationship growth · 70 in window · 15% of score
25
7 — Hugging Face
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 21 in window · 76% of score
  • Event involvement · 14 in window · 12% of score
  • Coverage · 47 in window · 7% of score
21
8 — Nous Research
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 5 in window · 85% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 11% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 2% of score
19
9 ▲7 TypeSafe
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 48% of score
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 39% of score
  • Event involvement · 6 in window · 6% of score
17
10 ▲11 CoreWeave
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 31% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 2 in window · 28% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 19% of score
17
11 ▼2 Apple
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 51% of score
  • Event involvement · 20 in window · 22% of score
  • Relationship growth · 43 in window · 15% of score
16
12 ▲1 SiliconANGLE
Top factors
  • Event involvement · 56 in window · 63% of score
  • Coverage · 141 in window · 29% of score
  • Source diversity · 1 in window · 5% of score
16
13 ▼3 Waymo
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 64% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 15% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 14% of score
15
14 ▲4 Google DeepMind
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 62% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 16% of score
  • Event involvement · 9 in window · 11% of score
14
15 ▲2 Amazon
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 58% of score
  • Relationship growth · 53 in window · 21% of score
  • Coverage · 48 in window · 11% of score
14
16 ▼4 SpaceX
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 48% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 24% of score
  • Event involvement · 12 in window · 15% of score
14
17 ▼2 Arena
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 73% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 22% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 3% of score
13
18 ▼4 World Labs
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 49% of score
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 44% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 3% of score
13
19 ▲1 Nscale
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 55% of score
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 37% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 3% of score
12
20 ▼9 ElevenLabs
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 55% of score
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 37% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 3% of score
12
21 ▼2 TEKEVER
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 83% of score
  • Source diversity · 2 in window · 13% of score
  • Relationship growth · 4 in window · 2% of score
12
22 — AWS
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 47% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 21% of score
  • Event involvement · 12 in window · 19% of score
11
23 ▲2 Cloudflare
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 10 in window · 72% of score
  • Relationship growth · 25 in window · 13% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 9% of score
10
24 ▲6 Vercel
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 55% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 25% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 9% of score
9
25 ▼2 Amazon Web Services
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 63% of score
  • Event involvement · 8 in window · 15% of score
  • Relationship growth · 24 in window · 14% of score
9
26 ▲1 Mistral
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 71% of score
  • Relationship growth · 20 in window · 12% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 10% of score
9
27 ▲9 Dell
Top factors
  • Deployment evidence · 2 in window · 51% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 32% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 10% of score
9
28 new Tesla
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 73% of score
  • Relationship growth · 17 in window · 12% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 9% of score
8
29 ▼1 DeepSeek
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 79% of score
  • Relationship growth · 12 in window · 9% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 7% of score
7
30 ▲3 AMD
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 80% of score
  • Relationship growth · 10 in window · 8% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 7% of score
7
31 ▼7 IBM
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 40% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 32% of score
  • Event involvement · 6 in window · 15% of score
7
32 ▲3 Reuters
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 72% of score
  • Event involvement · 8 in window · 20% of score
  • Coverage · 14 in window · 6% of score
7
33 ▼4 SAP
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 5 in window · 53% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 34% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 5% of score
7
34 ▼8 GitHub
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 66% of score
  • Relationship growth · 14 in window · 12% of score
  • Coverage · 24 in window · 11% of score
7
35 new Alibaba
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 78% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 8% of score
  • Relationship growth · 10 in window · 8% of score
7
36 ▲3 Google Cloud
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 75% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 12% of score
  • Relationship growth · 10 in window · 9% of score
6
37 new Mistral AI
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 79% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 9% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 8% of score
6
38 — TechCrunch
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 53% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 22% of score
  • Coverage · 30 in window · 17% of score
6
39 new Epic Games
Top factors
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 43% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 41% of score
  • Relationship growth · 9 in window · 9% of score
5
40 ▼6 DeepMind
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 85% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 7% of score
  • Coverage · 6 in window · 4% of score
5

Methodology

Scope. Companies with robotics-matching coverage or a deployment record. Robotics context means coverage matching “robot”, “humanoid”, “autonomous vehicle”, “drone” or “warehouse automation”, or a deployment tracked on the Physical AI page.

Computation. Updated weekly (Monday morning) over the trailing 30 days of TLDRocket's own coverage — no external data, no generated scores. Companies need at least 3 visible stories in the window to be ranked (minimum data threshold); the top 40 are kept. Each factor below is normalized 0–1 against the highest value in that week's candidate set, multiplied by its weight, and summed into the score. Ties break on raw coverage, then company name.

Not investment advice. A ranking measures how much a company is being written about, nothing else. It says nothing about the quality of a business, its shares or its prospects, and it is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything.

Factor Weight What it counts
Coverage 0.15 Visible stories linked to the company in the window.
Source diversity 0.25 Distinct publications behind that coverage — the anti-gaming counterweight to raw volume.
Event involvement 0.15 Named events in the window whose coverage involves the company.
Funding activity 0.15 Funding rounds raised by the company in the window.
Deployment evidence 0.15 Real-world deployments tracked with the company as vendor in the window — independent validation beyond announcements.
Relationship growth 0.15 New source-backed relationships involving the company in the window.

Anti-gaming. Source diversity is weighted above raw coverage, so press-release volume from a single outlet cannot dominate the ranking on its own. Deployment evidence, funding rounds and new relationships add independent validation beyond announcement counts.

Snapshot of week of 19 Oct 2026 · movement is measured against the week of 12 Oct 2026 · historical snapshots stay available via the week links above.