Physical AI Top 40

The same momentum score, restricted to companies with robotics coverage or a tracked real-world deployment — humanoids, warehouse robots, autonomous vehicles and drones.

Snapshot of week of 12 Oct 2026 other weeks: 9 Nov 2 Nov 26 Oct 19 Oct 12 Oct 5 Oct 28 Sep 21 Sep 14 Sep 7 Sep 31 Aug 24 Aug 17 Aug 10 Aug 3 Aug

# Δ Company Score
1 — OpenAI
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 39 in window · 25% of score
  • Coverage · 560 in window · 15% of score
  • Funding activity · 5 in window · 15% of score
100
2 — Anthropic
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 34 in window · 38% of score
  • Event involvement · 75 in window · 19% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 3 in window · 16% of score
58
3 — Google
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 28 in window · 36% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 5 in window · 30% of score
  • Event involvement · 49 in window · 15% of score
50
4 — Meta
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 25 in window · 40% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 3 in window · 23% of score
  • Event involvement · 34 in window · 13% of score
40
5 — NVIDIA
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 22 in window · 41% of score
  • Event involvement · 36 in window · 15% of score
  • Relationship growth · 113 in window · 15% of score
35
6 ▲1 Microsoft
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 21 in window · 59% of score
  • Event involvement · 23 in window · 15% of score
  • Relationship growth · 73 in window · 15% of score
23
7 ▲1 Hugging Face
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 24 in window · 78% of score
  • Event involvement · 13 in window · 10% of score
  • Coverage · 53 in window · 7% of score
20
8 new Nous Research
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 5 in window · 86% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 11% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 2% of score
18
9 ▼3 Apple
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 45% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 19% of score
  • Event involvement · 18 in window · 17% of score
16
10 ▲23 Waymo
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 60% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 20% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 13% of score
15
11 ▼1 ElevenLabs
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 66% of score
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 28% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 3% of score
14
12 ▲10 SpaceX
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 10 in window · 52% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 24% of score
  • Event involvement · 10 in window · 12% of score
12
13 ▲4 SiliconANGLE
Top factors
  • Event involvement · 51 in window · 62% of score
  • Coverage · 137 in window · 30% of score
  • Source diversity · 1 in window · 5% of score
12
14 ▼1 World Labs
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 50% of score
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 43% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 4% of score
12
15 new Arena
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 75% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 21% of score
  • Coverage · 4 in window · 1% of score
12
16 new TypeSafe
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 10 in window · 58% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 27% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 7% of score
11
17 ▼3 Amazon
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 10 in window · 58% of score
  • Relationship growth · 44 in window · 18% of score
  • Coverage · 48 in window · 12% of score
11
18 ▼2 Google DeepMind
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 13 in window · 77% of score
  • Event involvement · 8 in window · 11% of score
  • Relationship growth · 16 in window · 7% of score
11
19 ▼4 TEKEVER
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 84% of score
  • Source diversity · 2 in window · 12% of score
  • Relationship growth · 4 in window · 2% of score
11
20 ▼9 Nscale
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 56% of score
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 36% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 3% of score
11
21 ▼2 CoreWeave
Top factors
  • Deployment evidence · 2 in window · 58% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 18% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 10% of score
10
22 ▼2 AWS
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 41% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 32% of score
  • Event involvement · 9 in window · 14% of score
9
23 ▲1 Amazon Web Services
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 59% of score
  • Event involvement · 12 in window · 20% of score
  • Relationship growth · 24 in window · 13% of score
9
24 ▼1 IBM
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 5 in window · 42% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 39% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 8% of score
8
25 ▲1 Cloudflare
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 76% of score
  • Relationship growth · 21 in window · 12% of score
  • Coverage · 17 in window · 6% of score
8
26 ▼1 GitHub
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 68% of score
  • Event involvement · 6 in window · 12% of score
  • Relationship growth · 18 in window · 11% of score
8
27 ▼9 Mistral
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 78% of score
  • Relationship growth · 19 in window · 12% of score
  • Coverage · 17 in window · 6% of score
7
28 ▼7 DeepSeek
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 10 in window · 87% of score
  • Coverage · 13 in window · 5% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 4% of score
7
29 new SAP
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 5 in window · 46% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 43% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 4% of score
7
30 — Vercel
Top factors
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 44% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 37% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 9% of score
7
31 ▼2 Perplexity
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 77% of score
  • Relationship growth · 15 in window · 10% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 9% of score
7
32 ▼5 Crusoe
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 47% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 40% of score
  • Relationship growth · 9 in window · 6% of score
6
33 ▼2 AMD
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 84% of score
  • Relationship growth · 9 in window · 7% of score
  • Coverage · 11 in window · 5% of score
6
34 ▲1 DeepMind
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 87% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 5% of score
  • Relationship growth · 6 in window · 5% of score
6
35 ▲3 Reuters
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 69% of score
  • Event involvement · 8 in window · 21% of score
  • Coverage · 14 in window · 7% of score
6
36 new Dell
Top factors
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 56% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 36% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 6% of score
5
37 ▼5 Oura
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 57% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 37% of score
  • Relationship growth · 5 in window · 4% of score
5
38 new TechCrunch
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 50% of score
  • Event involvement · 9 in window · 26% of score
  • Coverage · 31 in window · 16% of score
5
39 new Google Cloud
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 76% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 12% of score
  • Relationship growth · 10 in window · 9% of score
5
40 new Samsung
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 78% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 9% of score
  • Relationship growth · 9 in window · 8% of score
5

Methodology

Scope. Companies with robotics-matching coverage or a deployment record. Robotics context means coverage matching “robot”, “humanoid”, “autonomous vehicle”, “drone” or “warehouse automation”, or a deployment tracked on the Physical AI page.

Computation. Updated weekly (Monday morning) over the trailing 30 days of TLDRocket's own coverage — no external data, no generated scores. Companies need at least 3 visible stories in the window to be ranked (minimum data threshold); the top 40 are kept. Each factor below is normalized 0–1 against the highest value in that week's candidate set, multiplied by its weight, and summed into the score. Ties break on raw coverage, then company name.

Not investment advice. A ranking measures how much a company is being written about, nothing else. It says nothing about the quality of a business, its shares or its prospects, and it is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything.

Factor Weight What it counts
Coverage 0.15 Visible stories linked to the company in the window.
Source diversity 0.25 Distinct publications behind that coverage — the anti-gaming counterweight to raw volume.
Event involvement 0.15 Named events in the window whose coverage involves the company.
Funding activity 0.15 Funding rounds raised by the company in the window.
Deployment evidence 0.15 Real-world deployments tracked with the company as vendor in the window — independent validation beyond announcements.
Relationship growth 0.15 New source-backed relationships involving the company in the window.

Anti-gaming. Source diversity is weighted above raw coverage, so press-release volume from a single outlet cannot dominate the ranking on its own. Deployment evidence, funding rounds and new relationships add independent validation beyond announcement counts.

Snapshot of week of 12 Oct 2026 · movement is measured against the week of 5 Oct 2026 · historical snapshots stay available via the week links above.