TLDRocket
Sign in

Physical AI Top 100

The same momentum score, restricted to companies with robotics coverage or a tracked real-world deployment — humanoids, warehouse robots, autonomous vehicles and drones.

Snapshot of week of 3 Aug 2026

# Δ Company Score
1 OpenAI
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 42 in window · 45% of score
  • Coverage · 408 in window · 27% of score
  • Event involvement · 88 in window · 27% of score
0.550
2 Anthropic
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 42 in window · 50% of score
  • Event involvement · 74 in window · 25% of score
  • Coverage · 327 in window · 24% of score
0.496
3 Google
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 30 in window · 58% of score
  • Event involvement · 44 in window · 24% of score
  • Coverage · 153 in window · 18% of score
0.310
4 NVIDIA
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 22 in window · 66% of score
  • Coverage · 93 in window · 17% of score
  • Event involvement · 20 in window · 17% of score
0.199
5 Meta
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 21 in window · 67% of score
  • Event involvement · 19 in window · 17% of score
  • Coverage · 80 in window · 16% of score
0.187
6 Microsoft
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 21 in window · 69% of score
  • Event involvement · 19 in window · 18% of score
  • Coverage · 63 in window · 13% of score
0.181
7 Hugging Face
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 20 in window · 69% of score
  • Coverage · 79 in window · 17% of score
  • Event involvement · 14 in window · 14% of score
0.172
8 Apple
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 15 in window · 73% of score
  • Event involvement · 10 in window · 14% of score
  • Coverage · 43 in window · 13% of score
0.122
9 DeepSeek
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 15 in window · 77% of score
  • Event involvement · 10 in window · 15% of score
  • Coverage · 26 in window · 8% of score
0.116
10 Amazon
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 62% of score
  • Event involvement · 15 in window · 22% of score
  • Coverage · 48 in window · 15% of score
0.115
11 Alibaba
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 15 in window · 78% of score
  • Event involvement · 9 in window · 13% of score
  • Coverage · 26 in window · 8% of score
0.114
12 Google DeepMind
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 78% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 13% of score
  • Coverage · 22 in window · 9% of score
0.091
13 Moonshot
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 84% of score
  • Coverage · 19 in window · 8% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 8% of score
0.085
14 Sakana AI
Top factors
  • Event involvement · 21 in window · 43% of score
  • Coverage · 83 in window · 36% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 21% of score
0.084
15 China
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 77% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 14% of score
  • Coverage · 16 in window · 10% of score
0.062
16 AWS
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 64% of score
  • Event involvement · 6 in window · 18% of score
  • Coverage · 26 in window · 17% of score
0.056
17 GitHub
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 79% of score
  • Coverage · 16 in window · 11% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 10% of score
0.053
18 Tesla
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 83% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 10% of score
  • Coverage · 8 in window · 6% of score
0.050
19 ByteDance
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 85% of score
  • Coverage · 11 in window · 8% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 7% of score
0.049
20 Cloudflare
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 85% of score
  • Coverage · 11 in window · 8% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 7% of score
0.049
21 AMD
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 87% of score
  • Coverage · 9 in window · 7% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 7% of score
0.048
22 Google Cloud
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 85% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 8% of score
  • Coverage · 7 in window · 6% of score
0.042
23 Amazon Web Services
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 66% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 24% of score
  • Coverage · 11 in window · 11% of score
0.036
24 Palantir
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 77% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 16% of score
  • Coverage · 6 in window · 7% of score
0.031
25 Trump administration
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 77% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 16% of score
  • Coverage · 5 in window · 6% of score
0.031
26 Baidu
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 82% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 12% of score
  • Coverage · 6 in window · 8% of score
0.029
27 Khosla Ventures
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 82% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 12% of score
  • Coverage · 5 in window · 6% of score
0.029
28 Black Forest Labs
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 82% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 12% of score
  • Coverage · 4 in window · 5% of score
0.029
29 Uber
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 82% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 12% of score
  • Coverage · 4 in window · 5% of score
0.029
30 DeepMind
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 88% of score
  • Coverage · 4 in window · 6% of score
  • Event involvement · 1 in window · 6% of score
0.027
31 European Union
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 75% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 21% of score
  • Coverage · 4 in window · 6% of score
0.024
32 Alphabet
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 75% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 21% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 5% of score
0.024
33 Poolside
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 75% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 21% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 5% of score
0.024
34 Citadel
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 81% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 15% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 5% of score
0.022
35 Etched
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 81% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 15% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 5% of score
0.022
36 ElevenLabs
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 85% of score
  • Event involvement · 1 in window · 8% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 5% of score
0.021
37 Huawei
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 85% of score
  • Event involvement · 1 in window · 8% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 5% of score
0.021
38 Northzone
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 94% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 6% of score
0.019
39 Patreon
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 94% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 6% of score
0.019
40 Japan
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 2 in window · 74% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 21% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 7% of score
0.016
41 Lux Capital
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 2 in window · 79% of score
  • Event involvement · 1 in window · 11% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 7% of score
0.015
42 Sequoia Capital
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 1 in window · 46% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 39% of score
  • Coverage · 5 in window · 14% of score
0.013
43 AMI Labs
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 2 in window · 92% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 8% of score
0.013

Methodology

Scope. Companies with robotics-matching coverage or a deployment record. Robotics context means coverage matching “robot”, “humanoid”, “autonomous vehicle”, “drone” or “warehouse automation”, or a deployment tracked on the Physical AI page.

Computation. Updated weekly (Monday morning) over the trailing 30 days of TLDRocket's own coverage — no external data, no generated scores. Companies need at least 3 visible stories in the window to be ranked (minimum data threshold); the top 100 are kept. Each factor below is normalized 0–1 against the highest value in that week's candidate set, multiplied by its weight, and summed into the score. Ties break on raw coverage, then company name.

Factor Weight What it counts
Coverage 0.15 Visible stories linked to the company in the window.
Source diversity 0.25 Distinct publications behind that coverage — the anti-gaming counterweight to raw volume.
Event involvement 0.15 Named events in the window whose coverage involves the company.
Funding activity 0.15 Funding rounds raised by the company in the window.
Deployment evidence 0.15 Real-world deployments tracked with the company as vendor in the window — independent validation beyond announcements.
Relationship growth 0.15 New source-backed relationships involving the company in the window.

Anti-gaming. Source diversity is weighted above raw coverage, so press-release volume from a single outlet cannot dominate the ranking on its own. Deployment evidence, funding rounds and new relationships add independent validation beyond announcement counts.

Snapshot of week of 3 Aug 2026 · historical snapshots stay available via the week links above.

The daily briefing

Every AI story that matters, in your inbox by 8am.

TLDRocket reads 60+ sources, removes duplicate coverage, and summarises the day in two minutes. Follow companies and topics for alerts, or get the briefing in Slack. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.