Physical AI Top 40

The same momentum score, restricted to companies with robotics coverage or a tracked real-world deployment — humanoids, warehouse robots, autonomous vehicles and drones.

Snapshot of week of 9 Nov 2026 other weeks: 9 Nov 2 Nov 26 Oct 19 Oct 12 Oct 5 Oct 28 Sep 21 Sep 14 Sep 7 Sep 31 Aug 24 Aug 17 Aug 10 Aug 3 Aug

# Δ Company Score
1 — OpenAI
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 33 in window · 32% of score
  • Coverage · 352 in window · 19% of score
  • Event involvement · 87 in window · 19% of score
100
2 — Anthropic
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 29 in window · 37% of score
  • Coverage · 280 in window · 20% of score
  • Event involvement · 62 in window · 18% of score
76
3 — Google
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 26 in window · 34% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 5 in window · 26% of score
  • Relationship growth · 122 in window · 15% of score
74
4 — NVIDIA
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 23 in window · 34% of score
  • Relationship growth · 170 in window · 24% of score
  • Coverage · 159 in window · 13% of score
64
5 — Meta
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 24 in window · 39% of score
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 21% of score
  • Relationship growth · 81 in window · 12% of score
59
6 — Microsoft
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 20 in window · 57% of score
  • Event involvement · 23 in window · 15% of score
  • Coverage · 84 in window · 14% of score
34
7 ▲3 Apple
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 35% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 2 in window · 23% of score
  • Relationship growth · 72 in window · 19% of score
33
8 ▲1 Amazon
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 17 in window · 58% of score
  • Relationship growth · 63 in window · 20% of score
  • Coverage · 67 in window · 13% of score
28
9 ▼1 DeepSeek
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 46% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 25% of score
  • Relationship growth · 43 in window · 15% of score
25
10 ▼3 SpaceX
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 44% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 26% of score
  • Relationship growth · 30 in window · 11% of score
24
11 ▲1 Pigment
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 82% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 12% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 3% of score
23
12 ▼1 CoreWeave
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 57% of score
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 30% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 7% of score
22
13 ▲3 Tesla
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 41% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 2 in window · 36% of score
  • Relationship growth · 21 in window · 9% of score
21
14 ▼1 Hugging Face
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 13 in window · 66% of score
  • Event involvement · 15 in window · 17% of score
  • Coverage · 31 in window · 9% of score
19
15 — SiliconANGLE
Top factors
  • Event involvement · 45 in window · 57% of score
  • Coverage · 106 in window · 33% of score
  • Source diversity · 1 in window · 6% of score
17
16 ▼2 Google DeepMind
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 10 in window · 56% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 22% of score
  • Relationship growth · 17 in window · 9% of score
17
17 ▲1 TypeSafe
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 49% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 40% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 6% of score
16
18 ▲2 Alphabet
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 77% of score
  • Coverage · 28 in window · 10% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 7% of score
15
19 ▲7 Amazon Web Services
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 58% of score
  • Relationship growth · 27 in window · 16% of score
  • Event involvement · 9 in window · 13% of score
15
20 new ElevenLabs
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 44% of score
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 40% of score
  • Relationship growth · 12 in window · 7% of score
14
21 ▲1 GitHub
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 10 in window · 67% of score
  • Relationship growth · 20 in window · 12% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 11% of score
14
22 ▼3 Mistral AI
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 46% of score
  • Source diversity · 5 in window · 35% of score
  • Event involvement · 6 in window · 9% of score
14
23 ▲5 Cognition
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 47% of score
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 43% of score
  • Relationship growth · 6 in window · 4% of score
13
24 ▼3 Google Cloud
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 79% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 8% of score
  • Relationship growth · 12 in window · 8% of score
13
25 ▼8 Mistral
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 66% of score
  • Relationship growth · 20 in window · 14% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 12% of score
13
26 ▼3 Cloudflare
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 67% of score
  • Relationship growth · 24 in window · 17% of score
  • Coverage · 22 in window · 9% of score
13
27 new Nscale
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 50% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 30% of score
  • Event involvement · 6 in window · 10% of score
13
28 ▼4 Waymo
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 54% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 33% of score
  • Relationship growth · 12 in window · 9% of score
12
29 ▼4 IBM
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 57% of score
  • Relationship growth · 24 in window · 21% of score
  • Coverage · 21 in window · 11% of score
10
30 new Nasdaq
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 78% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 11% of score
  • Coverage · 16 in window · 9% of score
10
31 ▲9 Perplexity
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 70% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 16% of score
  • Relationship growth · 9 in window · 8% of score
10
32 new DoorDash
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 5 in window · 51% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 40% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 5% of score
9
33 ▼2 Alibaba
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 74% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 12% of score
  • Coverage · 11 in window · 7% of score
9
34 new xAI
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 78% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 10% of score
  • Coverage · 9 in window · 6% of score
9
35 ▼3 DeepMind
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 79% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 10% of score
  • Relationship growth · 6 in window · 6% of score
9
36 ▲3 Epic Games
Top factors
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 45% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 34% of score
  • Relationship growth · 14 in window · 15% of score
8
37 ▼7 AWS
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 5 in window · 57% of score
  • Event involvement · 8 in window · 21% of score
  • Relationship growth · 11 in window · 12% of score
8
38 ▼4 Dell
Top factors
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 46% of score
  • Source diversity · 2 in window · 24% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 13% of score
8
39 ▼6 Walmart
Top factors
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 50% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 38% of score
  • Relationship growth · 6 in window · 7% of score
8
40 ▼4 Vercel
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 76% of score
  • Relationship growth · 11 in window · 13% of score
  • Coverage · 11 in window · 8% of score
8

Methodology

Scope. Companies with robotics-matching coverage or a deployment record. Robotics context means coverage matching “robot”, “humanoid”, “autonomous vehicle”, “drone” or “warehouse automation”, or a deployment tracked on the Physical AI page.

Computation. Updated weekly (Monday morning) over the trailing 30 days of TLDRocket's own coverage — no external data, no generated scores. Companies need at least 3 visible stories in the window to be ranked (minimum data threshold); the top 40 are kept. Each factor below is normalized 0–1 against the highest value in that week's candidate set, multiplied by its weight, and summed into the score. Ties break on raw coverage, then company name.

Not investment advice. A ranking measures how much a company is being written about, nothing else. It says nothing about the quality of a business, its shares or its prospects, and it is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything.

Factor Weight What it counts
Coverage 0.15 Visible stories linked to the company in the window.
Source diversity 0.25 Distinct publications behind that coverage — the anti-gaming counterweight to raw volume.
Event involvement 0.15 Named events in the window whose coverage involves the company.
Funding activity 0.15 Funding rounds raised by the company in the window.
Deployment evidence 0.15 Real-world deployments tracked with the company as vendor in the window — independent validation beyond announcements.
Relationship growth 0.15 New source-backed relationships involving the company in the window.

Anti-gaming. Source diversity is weighted above raw coverage, so press-release volume from a single outlet cannot dominate the ranking on its own. Deployment evidence, funding rounds and new relationships add independent validation beyond announcement counts.

Snapshot of week of 9 Nov 2026 · movement is measured against the week of 2 Nov 2026 · historical snapshots stay available via the week links above.