AI Momentum Top 40

The AI companies moving fastest in TLDRocket's own coverage: stories, events, funding, deployments and new relationships over the trailing window — with source diversity weighted above raw volume.

Snapshot of week of 9 Nov 2026 other weeks: 9 Nov 2 Nov 26 Oct 19 Oct 12 Oct 5 Oct 28 Sep 21 Sep 14 Sep 7 Sep 31 Aug 24 Aug 17 Aug 10 Aug 3 Aug

# Δ Company Score
1 — OpenAI
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 33 in window · 32% of score
  • Coverage · 352 in window · 19% of score
  • Event involvement · 87 in window · 19% of score
100
2 — Anthropic
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 29 in window · 37% of score
  • Coverage · 280 in window · 20% of score
  • Event involvement · 62 in window · 18% of score
76
3 — Google
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 26 in window · 34% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 5 in window · 26% of score
  • Relationship growth · 122 in window · 15% of score
74
4 — NVIDIA
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 23 in window · 34% of score
  • Relationship growth · 170 in window · 24% of score
  • Coverage · 159 in window · 13% of score
64
5 — Meta
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 24 in window · 39% of score
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 21% of score
  • Relationship growth · 81 in window · 12% of score
59
6 — Microsoft
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 20 in window · 57% of score
  • Event involvement · 23 in window · 15% of score
  • Coverage · 84 in window · 14% of score
34
7 ▲3 Apple
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 35% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 2 in window · 23% of score
  • Relationship growth · 72 in window · 19% of score
33
8 ▲1 Amazon
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 17 in window · 58% of score
  • Relationship growth · 63 in window · 20% of score
  • Coverage · 67 in window · 13% of score
28
9 ▼1 DeepSeek
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 46% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 25% of score
  • Relationship growth · 43 in window · 15% of score
25
10 ▼3 SpaceX
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 44% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 26% of score
  • Relationship growth · 30 in window · 11% of score
24
11 ▲3 Legora
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 53% of score
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 32% of score
  • Relationship growth · 16 in window · 6% of score
24
12 — Pigment
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 82% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 12% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 3% of score
23
13 ▼2 CoreWeave
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 57% of score
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 30% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 7% of score
22
14 ▲5 Tesla
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 41% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 2 in window · 36% of score
  • Relationship growth · 21 in window · 9% of score
21
15 ▲1 Character.AI
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 63% of score
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 29% of score
  • Coverage · 11 in window · 3% of score
20
16 ▼3 Hugging Face
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 13 in window · 66% of score
  • Event involvement · 15 in window · 17% of score
  • Coverage · 31 in window · 9% of score
19
17 new FAL
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 72% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 22% of score
  • Relationship growth · 6 in window · 3% of score
18
18 — SiliconANGLE
Top factors
  • Event involvement · 45 in window · 57% of score
  • Coverage · 106 in window · 33% of score
  • Source diversity · 1 in window · 6% of score
17
19 ▼2 Google DeepMind
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 10 in window · 56% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 22% of score
  • Relationship growth · 17 in window · 9% of score
17
20 ▲2 TypeSafe
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 49% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 40% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 6% of score
16
21 ▲2 Modal
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 81% of score
  • Source diversity · 2 in window · 12% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 3% of score
16
22 ▲4 Alphabet
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 77% of score
  • Coverage · 28 in window · 10% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 7% of score
15
23 ▲10 Amazon Web Services
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 58% of score
  • Relationship growth · 27 in window · 16% of score
  • Event involvement · 9 in window · 13% of score
15
24 new ElevenLabs
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 44% of score
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 40% of score
  • Relationship growth · 12 in window · 7% of score
14
25 ▲3 GitHub
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 10 in window · 67% of score
  • Relationship growth · 20 in window · 12% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 11% of score
14
26 ▼2 Mistral AI
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 46% of score
  • Source diversity · 5 in window · 35% of score
  • Event involvement · 6 in window · 9% of score
14
27 ▲10 Cognition
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 47% of score
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 43% of score
  • Relationship growth · 6 in window · 4% of score
13
28 ▼1 Google Cloud
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 79% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 8% of score
  • Relationship growth · 12 in window · 8% of score
13
29 ▼8 Mistral
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 66% of score
  • Relationship growth · 20 in window · 14% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 12% of score
13
30 ▼1 Cloudflare
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 67% of score
  • Relationship growth · 24 in window · 17% of score
  • Coverage · 22 in window · 9% of score
13
31 new Nscale
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 50% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 30% of score
  • Event involvement · 6 in window · 10% of score
13
32 new Bloomberg
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 73% of score
  • Event involvement · 9 in window · 17% of score
  • Coverage · 15 in window · 7% of score
12
33 ▼3 Waymo
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 54% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 33% of score
  • Relationship growth · 12 in window · 9% of score
12
34 ▼2 Cohere
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 55% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 33% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 6% of score
12
35 ▲1 Blacksmith
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 58% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 35% of score
  • Relationship growth · 4 in window · 3% of score
11
36 ▲3 Ambio
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 60% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 27% of score
  • Relationship growth · 10 in window · 8% of score
10
37 ▲3 Wabi
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 61% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 28% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 7% of score
10
38 ▼7 IBM
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 57% of score
  • Relationship growth · 24 in window · 21% of score
  • Coverage · 21 in window · 11% of score
10
39 new YouTube
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 86% of score
  • Coverage · 10 in window · 5% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 4% of score
10
40 new Causa Prima
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 63% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 29% of score
  • Relationship growth · 5 in window · 4% of score
10

Methodology

Scope. All companies TLDRocket covers.

Computation. Updated weekly (Monday morning) over the trailing 30 days of TLDRocket's own coverage — no external data, no generated scores. Companies need at least 3 visible stories in the window to be ranked (minimum data threshold); the top 40 are kept. Each factor below is normalized 0–1 against the highest value in that week's candidate set, multiplied by its weight, and summed into the score. Ties break on raw coverage, then company name.

Not investment advice. A ranking measures how much a company is being written about, nothing else. It says nothing about the quality of a business, its shares or its prospects, and it is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything.

Factor Weight What it counts
Coverage 0.15 Visible stories linked to the company in the window.
Source diversity 0.25 Distinct publications behind that coverage — the anti-gaming counterweight to raw volume.
Event involvement 0.15 Named events in the window whose coverage involves the company.
Funding activity 0.15 Funding rounds raised by the company in the window.
Deployment evidence 0.15 Real-world deployments tracked with the company as vendor in the window — independent validation beyond announcements.
Relationship growth 0.15 New source-backed relationships involving the company in the window.

Anti-gaming. Source diversity is weighted above raw coverage, so press-release volume from a single outlet cannot dominate the ranking on its own. Deployment evidence, funding rounds and new relationships add independent validation beyond announcement counts.

Snapshot of week of 9 Nov 2026 · movement is measured against the week of 2 Nov 2026 · historical snapshots stay available via the week links above.