AI Momentum Top 40

The AI companies moving fastest in TLDRocket's own coverage: stories, events, funding, deployments and new relationships over the trailing window — with source diversity weighted above raw volume.

Snapshot of week of 28 Sep 2026 other weeks: 9 Nov 2 Nov 26 Oct 19 Oct 12 Oct 5 Oct 28 Sep 21 Sep 14 Sep 7 Sep 31 Aug 24 Aug 17 Aug 10 Aug 3 Aug

# Δ Company Score
1 — OpenAI
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 40 in window · 28% of score
  • Coverage · 472 in window · 17% of score
  • Event involvement · 98 in window · 17% of score
100
2 — Anthropic
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 35 in window · 41% of score
  • Event involvement · 71 in window · 20% of score
  • Coverage · 294 in window · 18% of score
60
3 ▲2 Google
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 31 in window · 47% of score
  • Event involvement · 43 in window · 16% of score
  • Relationship growth · 178 in window · 15% of score
47
4 — NVIDIA
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 26 in window · 45% of score
  • Relationship growth · 194 in window · 19% of score
  • Coverage · 136 in window · 12% of score
41
5 ▲1 Meta
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 25 in window · 46% of score
  • Relationship growth · 145 in window · 15% of score
  • Coverage · 139 in window · 13% of score
38
6 ▼3 Hugging Face
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 31 in window · 65% of score
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 11% of score
  • Event involvement · 20 in window · 10% of score
34
7 ▲1 Microsoft
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 21 in window · 62% of score
  • Event involvement · 20 in window · 15% of score
  • Relationship growth · 76 in window · 13% of score
24
8 ▼1 Apple
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 13 in window · 40% of score
  • Event involvement · 23 in window · 17% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 2 in window · 15% of score
23
9 — Profound
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 9 in window · 85% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 11% of score
  • Relationship growth · 11 in window · 2% of score
20
10 — Wonderful
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 8 in window · 84% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 12% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 2% of score
18
11 new Basecamp Research
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 7 in window · 79% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 17% of score
  • Relationship growth · 9 in window · 2% of score
17
12 ▼1 Amazon
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 48% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 2 in window · 21% of score
  • Relationship growth · 63 in window · 16% of score
16
13 ▲14 Nscale
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 5 in window · 59% of score
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 31% of score
  • Relationship growth · 18 in window · 5% of score
16
14 ▼1 Google DeepMind
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 13 in window · 69% of score
  • Event involvement · 11 in window · 14% of score
  • Relationship growth · 34 in window · 10% of score
13
15 ▼3 SiliconANGLE
Top factors
  • Event involvement · 44 in window · 57% of score
  • Coverage · 115 in window · 31% of score
  • Relationship growth · 21 in window · 6% of score
13
16 new xAI
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 12 in window · 65% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 14% of score
  • Event involvement · 7 in window · 9% of score
13
17 ▼1 Exein
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 5 in window · 78% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 18% of score
  • Relationship growth · 6 in window · 2% of score
12
18 ▼4 SpaceX
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 10 in window · 59% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 16% of score
  • Relationship growth · 32 in window · 11% of score
12
19 ▼2 Salesforce
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 68% of score
  • Relationship growth · 36 in window · 13% of score
  • Event involvement · 8 in window · 12% of score
11
20 new Mistral AI
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 4 in window · 70% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 20% of score
  • Relationship growth · 15 in window · 6% of score
11
21 ▼3 Crusoe
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 54% of score
  • Source diversity · 5 in window · 34% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 5% of score
11
22 ▼1 Arcee AI
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 4 in window · 73% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 21% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 3% of score
10
23 ▼1 AIUC
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 4 in window · 73% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 21% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 3% of score
10
24 ▼1 Tandem Health
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 4 in window · 73% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 21% of score
  • Relationship growth · 8 in window · 3% of score
10
25 ▼5 Cognition
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 49% of score
  • Funding activity · 2 in window · 37% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 7% of score
10
26 ▼1 DeepSeek
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 11 in window · 81% of score
  • Relationship growth · 22 in window · 9% of score
  • Coverage · 13 in window · 5% of score
10
27 ▲2 Tesla
Top factors
  • Deployment evidence · 3 in window · 53% of score
  • Source diversity · 4 in window · 30% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 7% of score
10
28 ▼13 Perplexity
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 54% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 19% of score
  • Event involvement · 6 in window · 11% of score
9
29 ▼10 Alibaba
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 65% of score
  • Deployment evidence · 1 in window · 20% of score
  • Event involvement · 3 in window · 6% of score
9
30 ▲4 GitHub
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 74% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 10% of score
  • Coverage · 18 in window · 8% of score
9
31 ▼3 Amazon Web Services
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 50% of score
  • Event involvement · 10 in window · 20% of score
  • Relationship growth · 43 in window · 20% of score
9
32 — Mistral
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 7 in window · 58% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 22% of score
  • Relationship growth · 23 in window · 11% of score
9
33 new TypeSafe
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 67% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 23% of score
  • Event involvement · 2 in window · 4% of score
8
34 new Verda
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 69% of score
  • Source diversity · 3 in window · 26% of score
  • Event involvement · 1 in window · 2% of score
8
35 ▼4 Uber
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 9 in window · 79% of score
  • Event involvement · 5 in window · 11% of score
  • Coverage · 12 in window · 5% of score
8
36 ▼10 The Information
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 8 in window · 71% of score
  • Event involvement · 9 in window · 20% of score
  • Coverage · 13 in window · 6% of score
8
37 new TEKEVER
Top factors
  • Funding activity · 3 in window · 75% of score
  • Source diversity · 2 in window · 19% of score
  • Coverage · 3 in window · 2% of score
8
38 ▼2 Moonshot AI
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 57% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 25% of score
  • Event involvement · 4 in window · 9% of score
7
39 ▼9 Cohere
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 6 in window · 59% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 26% of score
  • Relationship growth · 12 in window · 7% of score
7
40 new Databricks
Top factors
  • Source diversity · 5 in window · 49% of score
  • Funding activity · 1 in window · 26% of score
  • Relationship growth · 30 in window · 17% of score
7

Methodology

Scope. All companies TLDRocket covers.

Computation. Updated weekly (Monday morning) over the trailing 30 days of TLDRocket's own coverage — no external data, no generated scores. Companies need at least 3 visible stories in the window to be ranked (minimum data threshold); the top 40 are kept. Each factor below is normalized 0–1 against the highest value in that week's candidate set, multiplied by its weight, and summed into the score. Ties break on raw coverage, then company name.

Not investment advice. A ranking measures how much a company is being written about, nothing else. It says nothing about the quality of a business, its shares or its prospects, and it is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold anything.

Factor Weight What it counts
Coverage 0.15 Visible stories linked to the company in the window.
Source diversity 0.25 Distinct publications behind that coverage — the anti-gaming counterweight to raw volume.
Event involvement 0.15 Named events in the window whose coverage involves the company.
Funding activity 0.15 Funding rounds raised by the company in the window.
Deployment evidence 0.15 Real-world deployments tracked with the company as vendor in the window — independent validation beyond announcements.
Relationship growth 0.15 New source-backed relationships involving the company in the window.

Anti-gaming. Source diversity is weighted above raw coverage, so press-release volume from a single outlet cannot dominate the ranking on its own. Deployment evidence, funding rounds and new relationships add independent validation beyond announcement counts.

Snapshot of week of 28 Sep 2026 · movement is measured against the week of 21 Sep 2026 · historical snapshots stay available via the week links above.