The Abundance Paradox
Sequoia by Konstantine Buhler
Netflix is buying Warner Bros. for more than $82B. Sequoia says AI will make old IP, not fresh content, more valuable.
Based on reporting by Sequoia, by Konstantine Buhler — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
Netflix has agreed to buy Warner Bros. in a deal valued at more than $82 billion, a move Sequoia calls the biggest and most consequential in Hollywood history. The package brings a pile of famous intellectual property with it: Batman, Superman, Harry Potter, Game of Thrones, The Big Bang Theory, The Sopranos, The Matrix, Lord of the Rings film rights, Godzilla/MonsterVerse, Mad Max and Mortal Kombat.
Sequoia’s argument is simple and a little counterintuitive. As AI pushes the cost of making content down, the supply of content will explode. That sounds like a recipe for abundance. But the firm says abundance doesn’t make everything cheap. It makes attention scarce, and that changes what people actually value.
The example it reaches for is the Musée d’Orsay in Paris, where industrial-era art became more, not less, prized as reproduction got easier. The same logic, Sequoia says, will apply to intellectual property in the AI era. When imitation gets cheaper, the original gets more precious. Not every original, of course. The ones that already live in people’s heads will have the edge.
That’s why Sequoia thinks nostalgic content sits in a sweet spot. AI can copy style and churn out endless new material, but it struggles with the exact details that make familiar characters and stories feel real. A slightly wrong voice, a small anachronism, one off note in a beloved narrative — and the whole thing starts to feel fake. In a market flooded with novelty, that kind of authenticity becomes the product.
The bigger point is that discovery will matter more as creation gets cheaper. Sequoia expects consumers to lean on dominant platforms to sort through the flood, while very few new ideas break out. So the value won’t sit with whoever can make the most stuff. It’ll sit with whoever already owns the stories people keep returning to.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
This is the part of AI nobody wants to hear: cheap generation doesn’t automatically create cheap value. It often does the opposite, especially for brands and stories people already trust. The hype crowd keeps cheering infinite content, but the real winners are usually the boring old rights holders with a long memory and a good lawyer.
Read more about this at: Sequoia
Related stories
“Zlibrary my beloved”: Anthropic staff chats extolling piracy cited in Sony suit
Ars Technica · 2 weeks ago ·
8
Anthropic needs to bring in Amazon-style earnings to justify its $2 trillion valuation—but it’s barely turned a profit
Fortune ·
35
Google needs Hollywood more than the studios need AI
The Verge · 2 weeks ago ·
6