The $15 billion ad-powered AI startup your doctor may already be using
Ars Technica Rafe Rosner-Uddin, Financial Times
Two-thirds of US doctors use OpenEvidence for patient decisions. It hit 42M prompts last month and is now valued at $15B.
Based on reporting by Ars Technica, Rafe Rosner-Uddin, Financial Times — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
A startup most people have never heard of is suddenly sitting at a $15 billion valuation because doctors keep using its AI search tool. OpenEvidence, based in Miami and founded by serial entrepreneur Daniel Nadler in 2022, says it is now being used by nearly two-thirds of US doctors.
That kind of reach is unusual anywhere. In medicine, it is almost startling. Nadler told the Financial Times that many of America’s 1 million physicians processed more than 42 million prompts last month, using the chatbot to search medical journals and clinical guidelines when making decisions about diagnosis and treatment.
The company makes money from ads, which is part of why the scale has drawn so much attention. It has also grown mostly through word of mouth, not the usual heavy-handed healthcare sales routine.
Nadler described it as the first viral consumer internet app in healthcare. That sounds like a boast, but the numbers give it some teeth. The bigger question is what it means when a system built for patient care starts to look, and spread, like a consumer internet hit.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
This is exactly how healthcare software sneaks into the room: not through grand hospital procurement theater, but through doctors quietly using what works. The ad model will make people twitchy, and fair enough — medicine and ad tech are not natural friends. But the real story is less about startup sparkle than about how badly clinicians want faster answers.
Read more about this at: Ars Technica
Related stories
A new medical AI study found the same flaw in OpenEvidence, OpenAI, Anthropic, and Doximity
Fortune ·
26