TLDRocket
Sign in

OpenAI Scholars 2019: Meet our Scholars

OpenAI

OpenAI picked 8 people out of 550 applicants for its 2019 Scholars program. They're not typical coders — think philosophy, cell biology, quantum physics backgrounds.

Based on reporting by OpenAI — read the original for the full story.

Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error

OpenAI has named its 2019 class of Scholars, whittling down a pool of 550 applicants to just eight. The program, which pays participants a stipend to study deep learning full-time with mentorship from OpenAI staff, is designed to pull talent from outside the usual computer-science pipeline into AI research.

What stands out about this cohort isn't the acceptance rate, brutal as it is at roughly 1.5%. It's the résumés. OpenAI says the group's collective expertise spans literature, philosophy, cell biology, statistics, economics, quantum physics, and business innovation. That's not a lineup you'd expect from a typical machine learning bootcamp, and it's clearly the point.

OpenAI has run versions of this program before, mostly aimed at increasing diversity in a field that skews heavily toward a narrow set of academic backgrounds. The bet here seems straightforward: people who've spent years thinking rigorously about ethics, markets, or cellular systems might bring pattern-recognition instincts that a standard CS degree doesn't teach. Whether that translates into better research output is the kind of thing that's hard to measure directly, but the logic tracks with a broader industry realization that AI's hardest problems, alignment, bias, interpretability, aren't purely technical.

The scholars will spend months building projects and presumably publishing writeups, which has been the pattern in past cohorts. For OpenAI, it's a relatively cheap way to test whether nontraditional backgrounds produce nontraditional insights. For the eight chosen, it's a shot at breaking into one of the most competitive corners of the tech industry without the usual credentialing.

My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting

I like this move more than most lab PR stunts, mostly because it's a quiet admission that AI research has been too homogenous for its own good. A philosopher or a cell biologist asking different questions than the fortieth Stanford CS grad in the room isn't just diversity theater, it's actual insurance against groupthink in a field that badly needs outsiders poking holes in its assumptions.

Read more about this at: OpenAI

Related stories

The daily briefing

Every AI story that matters, in your inbox by 8am.

TLDRocket reads all relevant sources, removes duplicate coverage, and summarises the day in two minutes. Follow companies and topics for alerts, or get the briefing in Slack. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.