TLDRocket
Sign in

OpenAI partners with Schibsted Media Group

OpenAI

OpenAI just struck a content deal with Schibsted Media Group, the Nordic publisher behind papers like Aftenposten and VG. ChatGPT will now pull in news and archive material, including Guardian content, straight into its answers.

Based on reporting by OpenAI — read the original for the full story.

Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error

OpenAI keeps stacking up media partnerships, and this week it's Schibsted Media Group's turn. The Norwegian publishing giant, which owns titles like Aftenposten and VG and has a footprint across the Nordic region, is letting OpenAI tap its journalism for ChatGPT. That includes current reporting and, notably, archive material stretching back through decades of coverage.

The twist here is the Guardian connection. Under this arrangement, Guardian news and archival content is also being routed into ChatGPT, which suggests the deal covers more than just Schibsted's own newsroom output. It points to a broader content-licensing structure where OpenAI is assembling access through multiple publishers and networks rather than negotiating one outlet at a time.

This fits a pattern OpenAI has been running for over a year now. Axel Springer, Associated Press, News Corp, and a growing list of others have signed similar agreements, each one trading archive and article access for licensing fees and, presumably, some assurance that ChatGPT will surface their reporting with attribution rather than scraping it for free. Schibsted joins that list as one of the more prominent European players, and its archive depth is the real prize. Decades of Nordic reporting on politics, business, and culture is not something a general-purpose model can fake convincingly.

For OpenAI, every deal like this is partly about training data and partly about defusing lawsuits before they start. Publishers have watched AI companies get sued or threatened with suits over unlicensed use of copyrighted material, and licensing deals are the industry's preferred way of avoiding that fight while still getting paid. Whether the payments are meaningful for a company Schibsted's size, or just a rounding error for OpenAI, is not something either side has disclosed.

My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting

I'll believe these licensing deals matter once someone publishes actual numbers, because right now they read more like PR insurance than genuine revenue for publishers. Schibsted gets to say it protected its journalism, OpenAI gets to say it's playing nice with the press, and everyone quietly avoids talking about how little cash likely changes hands compared to what the training data is actually worth.

Read more about this at: OpenAI

Related stories

The daily briefing

Every AI story that matters, in your inbox by 8am.

TLDRocket reads all relevant sources, removes duplicate coverage, and summarises the day in two minutes. Follow companies and topics for alerts, or get the briefing in Slack. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.