I've got an Inkling
Ben's Bites ● Covered by 4 sources
Thinking Machines released Inkling, its first open-weights model. It trails the top open models but you can fine-tune it for your own use.
Based on reporting by Ben's Bites — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
Thinking Machines put out its first open-weights model this week, and it's called Inkling. The headline spec is a 1 million token context window, and the model handles text, images and audio rather than just text alone. For a lab that's been mostly known for its research work, shipping something you can actually download and run is a real shift.
Here's the catch, though: Inkling isn't close to the best open models available right now. Most of those top performers come out of Chinese labs these days, and GLM-5.2 in particular has become the model a lot of startups are quietly switching to, running it self-hosted or fine-tuned instead of paying for frontier API access. GLM-5.2 does have a gap of its own — no vision support, so you can't drop an image into a prompt — which is exactly the kind of hole third-party tooling has started filling.
So why release a model that isn't chasing the top of the leaderboard? Because Inkling isn't really meant to win on raw capability out of the box. It's built to live on Tinker, Thinking Machines' own fine-tuning platform, where the point is turning a decent base model into something sharper for a narrow job. That's a different bet than trying to out-benchmark everyone else, and it's a bet on a market that's growing fast: companies increasingly want a model they can shape around their own data and workflows rather than a generic one they rent by the token.
And that framing matters more than the raw scores might suggest. If the real competition is shifting toward who has the best fine-tuning pipeline rather than who has the single smartest base model, then a merely decent multimodal model with a huge context window and a home platform built around customization could carve out a lane of its own, even while sitting behind the leaders on paper.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
Shipping a model that admittedly isn't best-in-class only makes sense if the real product is the fine-tuning platform sitting underneath it, and Thinking Machines seems to know that. Betting on customization over raw leaderboard position is the smarter long game anyway, especially with Chinese labs currently setting the pace on open weights. Nobody needs another also-ran chasing benchmark bragging rights; they need a base they can actually bend into something useful.
Read more about this at: Ben's Bites