Ground truth is a process, not a dataset
Amazon Science
Amazon's AI researchers found their human fact-checkers were only 60% accurate at verifying AI research reports. So they built a system where humans and AI models argue over disputed answers until the benchmark itself gets fixed.
Based on reporting by Amazon Science — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
Here's an uncomfortable secret about AI benchmarks: the people writing the
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
placeholder
Read more about this at: Amazon Science