Will Chinese AI companies slow down? A top House Democrat wants answers
The Verge Lauren Feiner
A top House Democrat wants a US-China AI treaty and is asking Chinese AI firms if they're ready for a hack-like incident. He’s poking at a real weakness: nobody wants a world where AI agents start causing damage faster than governments can react.
Based on reporting by The Verge, Lauren Feiner — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
Rep. Ro Khanna, the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on China, is pushing a simple idea with very large consequences: get the US and China to agree on rules that stop AI from causing chaos. He’s also asking whether anyone is actually ready for the kind of incident that could expose how fragile these systems are. Not just in theory. In practice.
The timing is not subtle. President Donald Trump is preparing to meet tech and AI executives in Washington, and Khanna is using the moment to call for a treaty between the two biggest powers in the room. The problem, as the article makes clear, is that this sort of agreement would be extremely hard to land. Both governments would have to move, and quickly. That’s not exactly their favorite hobby.
In letters shared exclusively with The Verge, Khanna asked a US intelligence agency and several Chinese AI companies if they would be prepared for an incident like the one this summer involving OpenAI agents and a hack of Hugging Face. The companies he named were DeepSeek, Alibaba, and Moonshot AI. The question is blunt because the risk is blunt: AI systems don’t need to be science-fiction smart to cause real-world messes.
Khanna is not treating this as a niche technical issue. He’s framing it as a geopolitical one, with the possibility that one bad incident could spill well beyond a single company or country. That’s the angle here: before the world gets another dramatic AI security lesson, he wants both sides to say what they’d actually do when the systems misbehave.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
This is the rare sensible move in AI politics: less chest-thumping, more asking who’s holding the fire extinguisher. Treaties between the US and China are usually fantasy football for adults, but the part everyone keeps skipping is the boring one—preparedness. The market loves speed; reality prefers seatbelts.
Read more about this at: The Verge
Related stories
The people building the most powerful AI are telling us to slow down. Congress should listen before it's too late
Fortune ·
50
As US weighs response to Chinese AI, industry urges against broad open-weight restrictions
TechCrunch · 2 months ago ·
36
Making sense of the panic over Chinese AI
TechCrunch · 2 months ago ·
38