TLDRocket
Sign in

Thoughts from San Francisco

Ben's Bites

Opinion — commentary, not a factual news event.

Ben’s Bites says AI users split into four camps, from “better Google” folks to builders. The real shift, he argues, is personal agents that feel fun, visible, and tweakable.

Based on reporting by Ben's Bites — read the original for the full story.

Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error

Ben’s Bites came back from San Francisco with a useful correction to the usual AI hype. The biggest mistake, he thinks, is assuming everyone wants the same thing from these tools. They don’t. There are the everyday users — the “better Google” crowd — and then there are the curious people who try Lovable or Replit, hit a database bug, hammer “fix it” a few times, and stop. After that come the non-engineers who know enough to steer a coding agent, and then the developers themselves.

That framing matters because it changes the job. In the Makerpad era, he thought his work was about turning people into builders. Now he says the real value was helping already-curious people learn how to build. Curiosity, in his view, comes from seeing examples that look playable, not serious. That’s why he keeps making odd little things, and why he renamed his talk to “how I build and play with AI”. Someone told him afterward they loved how often he said “play”. That sounds right to him. Copy, remix, learn.

His bigger bet is on personal agents, though he’s clear they’re not there yet. The pitch to ordinary users is tidy: let the agent do your computer work, like rebooking a flight. But for the people who live inside computers, the appeal is different. They want agents as a way to do much more with their own machines. And right now, the rough edges are obvious. One thread for everything is too blunt. He wants side threads, Slack-style. He wants little widgets that can be built on the fly. Wabi, he says, is the only thing he’s tried that does a version of that.

Then there’s memory, or the lack of a visible one. He’s spent months tending what he calls his “context garden”, and still doesn’t trust agents unless they show him what they remember. So he makes his own system sync every memory into a Google Doc. He also hates loops that don’t close, where an agent nags about some unfinished task that was actually handled somewhere else, like Gmail or a calendar. That’s the kind of problem he’s tempted to build through, not from scratch, using primitives like Pi instead of betting on one lab’s stack. The speed matters too. He says he’s not sending agents off overnight; he’s steering them all day, so fast feels smart. More compute, more surfaces, more play.

My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting

This is the right kind of skepticism: not anti-agent, just allergic to fake magic. The industry keeps selling one giant assistant when the real product may be small, visible tools people can actually poke at without losing trust. Also, “play” is doing more useful work here than most enterprise roadmaps ever will.

Read more about this at: Ben's Bites

Related stories

The daily briefing

Every AI story that matters, in your inbox by 8am.

TLDRocket reads all relevant sources, removes duplicate coverage, and summarises the day in two minutes. Follow companies and topics for alerts, or get the briefing in Slack. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.