TLDRocket
Sign in

Dave Eggers told OpenAI staff that ChatGPT was ‘silencing an entire generation’

The Verge Terrence O’Brien

Author Dave Eggers gave a talk at OpenAI and instead tore into the company over ChatGPT. He says the tool is destroying teachers' lives and stealing students' voices.

Based on reporting by The Verge, Terrence O’Brien — read the original for the full story.

Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error

Sam Altman invited novelist Dave Eggers to speak to roughly 200 OpenAI employees last year, and by most accounts it did not go the way a corporate speaker series usually goes. Eggers, a prolific writer with credits spanning novels, screenplays, journalism, McSweeney's, and several schools and nonprofits built around writing and the arts, used the stage to deliver a rebuke rather than a pep talk.

According to the Financial Times, Eggers told the room that ChatGPT's effect on teachers has been catastrophic, and that whether OpenAI meant to or not, the company has made every educator's job far harder than it was two years earlier. He didn't stop there. He argued that students who lean on the chatbot to compose their writing will never actually learn to write, and that in doing so they lose something more personal than a skill — their own voice, their ability to tell their own story in their own words. He called it nothing less than the silencing of an entire generation, maybe two.

None of this should have blindsided Altman, honestly. Eggers wrote The Circle, a novel that reads as a pointed takedown of Silicon Valley's surveillance-and-scale instincts, and he has previously dismissed AI-generated writing as "pastiche nonsense." Inviting him to address a room full of OpenAI staff was either a genuine act of openness to criticism or a serious miscalculation about what he'd say — possibly both.

What makes the moment land is the audience. Eggers wasn't writing an op-ed aimed at a general readership already primed to worry about AI and cheating. He was standing in front of the engineers and staff who build the product, telling them directly that their work is actively harming teachers and robbing students of the ability to articulate their own truth. That's a different kind of confrontation than a think-piece, and it's harder to wave off when it happens in your own building, to your own team.

My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting

Credit to Altman for putting a known critic in the room, but a single uncomfortable speech doesn't move a product roadmap. The real test isn't whether OpenAI can host someone who disagrees with them — it's whether anything about how ChatGPT gets built or marketed to schools changes because of it. History suggests companies love inviting their critics to speak far more than they love acting on what those critics say.

Read more about this at: The Verge

Related stories

The daily briefing

Every AI story that matters, in your inbox by 8am.

TLDRocket reads all relevant sources, removes duplicate coverage, and summarises the day in two minutes. Follow companies and topics for alerts, or get the briefing in Slack. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.