Technological Involution
TLDR
This article argues that technological progress has stagnated, with society having exhausted major innovations and left only engineering drudgery, while AI is currently useful mainly for software engineering rather than constituting broad progress. The author cites examples like a founder spending 3 hours manually fixing AI's debugging work after the system spent days in circles, and notes that AI-powered enterprise tools show unclear value beyond token costs. The shift going forward requires founders to become skilled operators tackling hard problems like enterprise complexity and hardware supply chains, rather than commoditized software solutions.
Why it matters
The post argues that technology has stagnated as capitalism is no longer putting pressure towards innovation, and that people with a deep belief in their ability to just do things have the power to change this trend.
