String Seed of Thought: Prompting LLMs for Distribution-Faithful and Diverse Generation
Sakana AI
Sakana AI found a prompt trick that makes LLMs actually follow randomness instead of faking it. Ask a model to flip a coin 100 times and it drifts way off 50:50 — this fixes that.
Based on reporting by Sakana AI — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
Ask a large language model to flip a fair coin a hundred times and something strange happens: the ratio of heads to tails drifts noticeably away from 50:50. The model knows what a fair coin should do in theory, but knowing the target distribution and actually producing outputs that match it turn out to be two very different problems.
Sakana AI says this isn't just a coin-flip curiosity. The same skew shows up when you ask a model to brainstorm story ideas or generate multiple solutions to a problem — the outputs bunch up around a narrow set of options instead of spreading out, which is exactly the opposite of what you want from a brainstorming tool or a recommendation system.
Their fix, called String Seed of Thought (SSoT), is almost embarrassingly simple. You just tell the model to generate a random string as part of its own output, then have it manipulate that string to derive its final answer. No external random number generator, no extra tooling — just a small addition to the prompt itself.
According to Sakana AI, SSoT cuts output bias across a wide range of models, both open and closed. Reasoning models like DeepSeek-R1 get close to the accuracy you'd see from genuine random sampling. The trick isn't limited to binary choices either — it scales up to n-way selections and arbitrary probability distributions. On the NoveltyBench diversity benchmark, SSoT beat other approaches across all six categories tested, and it did so without sacrificing output quality.
The paper is set to be presented at ICLR2026, and Sakana AI frames it as foundational groundwork for anything that needs LLMs to behave probabilistically in the real world — content generation, idea generation, and new approaches to inference-time scaling among them.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
It says something about where LLMs actually stand that a problem this basic — just flipping a coin fairly — needed a dedicated paper to fix, and that the fix is a prompt trick rather than a retrained model. Anyone using these systems for brainstorming or recommendations should treat that clustering bias as a real, quiet failure mode, not a quirky edge case. And it's a good reminder that impressive reasoning ability doesn't automatically buy you statistically sound behavior underneath.
Read more about this at: Sakana AI