Google Gemini Launch Delayed as Tech Falls Short of Internal Goals
Bloomberg ● Covered by 4 sources
Google's Gemini 3.5 Pro is running months late because it's not hitting internal coding benchmarks. That's a rare public stumble for a team that's been on a roll all year.
Based on reporting by Bloomberg — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
Google has quietly pushed back the release of Gemini 3.5 Pro, and the holdup comes down to something pretty specific: the model isn't coding as well as leadership wants it to. That's not a small gap to close. Coding benchmarks have become the industry's favorite yardstick, the thing every lab points to when they want to prove they're ahead of OpenAI or Anthropic, and Google apparently isn't satisfied with where 3.5 Pro currently lands.
The delay is now stretching into months, according to people familiar with the effort, and it's stirring up frustration inside the company. Engineers and researchers who worked on earlier Gemini releases are reportedly uneasy watching the schedule slip, and managers are worried about what a slower cadence means competitively. Google spent much of this year building momentum with Gemini 2.5 and its various Pro and Flash variants, closing a gap that once looked embarrassingly wide. A stumble now, even a modest one, risks handing that narrative back to rivals.
What makes this notable is that Google isn't just tweaking a minor feature or waiting on safety review. The company is trying to push a genuine capability jump in coding, an area where developers vote with their feet and switch tools the moment a rival model writes cleaner, more reliable code. Missing that bar internally suggests Google's own team believes shipping a mediocre coding upgrade would do more harm than staying quiet a little longer.
There's also a broader signal here about how tight the margins have gotten between the top AI labs. A few months of delay didn't used to matter much when foundation model releases came a year or more apart. Now, in a cycle where competitors ship meaningful updates every few weeks, even a modest slip can look like falling behind, whether or not the underlying model actually is.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
I'd rather Google take the extra months than ship a coding model that face-plants against Claude or GPT the week it launches — nobody remembers a late release, but everybody remembers a bad one. That said, the internal anxiety here says a lot about how brutal this release cadence has become; labs are now punishing themselves for delays that would've been unremarkable two years ago, and that pressure cooker rarely produces the most thoughtful engineering.
Read more about this at: Bloomberg
Related stories
Google announces Gemini 3.6 Flash and cybersecurity AI, teases 3.5 Pro and Gemini 4
Ars Technica · 1 month ago ·
40
Google ships 3 new Gemini models. Just not the one everyone’s waiting for.
The New Stack · 1 month ago ·
22