Claude Fable 5 vs. Kimi K3: Same results, one-third the cost, 4x slower
The New Stack Nick Lucchesi ● Covered by 5 sources
Moonshot AI's Kimi K3 model matched Anthropic's Claude Fable 5 line-for-line on three production coding tasks while costing roughly one-third as much ($2.13 versus $5.98 total). Kimi K3 took 28 minutes 18 seconds to complete all three tasks compared to Fable 5's 6 minutes 49 seconds—4x slower despite identical or near-identical outputs. The speed penalty makes Kimi K3 less practical for professional workflows despite its price advantage, though as a new release it may improve with future updates.
Why it matters
Moonshot AI released Kimi K3 in mid-July, selling it as a serious professional coding tool that competes head-on with Claude The post Claude Fable 5 vs. Kimi K3: Same results, one-third the cost, 4x slower appeared first on The New Stack.
Also covered by
- TLDR Dev — The Kimi K3 Moment
- Exponential View — 🔮 Kimi K3 surprise & AI economics; the solar paradox; AI's right to learn, cancer vaccine & junior jobs++
- MarkTechPost — Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5.2: Open Trillion-Scale MoE Models Compared on Benchmarks, License, and Serving Cost
- Simon Willison — Kimi K3, and what we can still learn from the pelican benchmark
