TLDRocket
Sign in

Agent Harness vs Agent Framework vs MCP: Which Layer Owns the Loop, State, Tools, Permissions, and Recovery

MarkTechPost Michal Sutter

Harnesses, agent frameworks, and MCP are separated as distinct layers in agent architecture, each owning different responsibilities in the execution stack. MCP became stateless in the 2026-07-28 update, while the article attributes no execution loop or agent state ownership to MCP and places tool-call contracts and transport there instead. As a result, developers choose whether they get a fixed loop and permissions from a harness, compose a loop from a framework, and then rely on MCP only for standardized tool/resource/prompt calls and elicitation.

Why it matters

A practitioner's map of the 3 layers in a modern agent stack, with verified sources and an overlap analysis. The post Agent Harness vs Agent Framework vs MCP: Which Layer Owns the Loop, State, Tools, Permissions, and Recovery appeared first on MarkTechPost.

Related stories

The daily briefing

Every AI story that matters, in your inbox by 8am.

TLDRocket reads all relevant sources, removes duplicate coverage, and summarises the day in two minutes. Follow companies and topics for alerts, or get the briefing in Slack. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.