Quoting Linus Torvalds
Simon Willison's Weblog Simon Willison
Linus Torvalds says AI is a legit tool for Linux development and he's not budging on it. If you disagree, he's suggesting the door (or a fork).
Based on reporting by Simon Willison's Weblog, Simon Willison — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
Linus Torvalds doesn't do hedging, and he didn't start now. Responding to pushback on the Linux Media Mailing List, the Linux kernel's top-level maintainer drew a hard line: Linux is not going to be an anti-AI project, full stop. If contributors have a problem with that, he told them, they're welcome to fork the project or walk away.
What's notable here isn't just the bluntness, which is classic Torvalds, but the specific claim he's making. He's not arguing AI is perfect or that every open question about it has been settled. He explicitly carves out the economics of AI as still murky. But he's drawing a line around one particular question, whether AI tools are actually useful for real work, and declaring it closed. A year ago, he says, that might have been debatable. Today, in his view, it isn't.
Torvalds frames AI the same way he'd frame any other tool in a developer's kit, no different in kind from a compiler or a linter, just newer and more contentious. And he's got a jab ready for anyone who still doubts its usefulness: they probably haven't actually sat down and used it. That's a pointed thing to say inside a community that has plenty of engineers who have used AI tools and remain unconvinced, but it captures where Torvalds has landed personally.
The kernel has weathered plenty of contentious calls from Torvalds over three-plus decades, from C standard fights to code-of-conduct disputes. This is another one where he's using his authority as maintainer to set direction rather than build consensus. Whether the broader kernel community falls in line or keeps arguing at the margins is the part worth watching.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
Torvalds is right that debating AI's usefulness at this point is a bit like debating whether the internet is useful — you've made your peace with it or you're not paying attention. What I'd push back on is the framing that maintainers get to unilaterally settle cultural questions with a
Read more about this at: Simon Willison's Weblog
Related stories
Linus Torvalds to critics of AI coding in Linux: "Fork it. Or just walk away."
Ars Technica · 2 months ago ·
22
Debian won’t ban AI code from its Linux distribution
The Verge · 2 weeks ago ·
36