TLDRocket
Sign in

Flock ‘Objects to Our Removing Their Equipment’: Emails Reveal Why a Town Put Bags Over Its Flock Cameras

404 Media Jason Koebler

Verona, Wisconsin voted to stop using Flock's license plate cameras, but Flock wouldn't take them down. So the city just threw trash bags over them instead.

Based on reporting by 404 Media, Jason Koebler — read the original for the full story.

Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error

Verona, Wisconsin thought ending a surveillance contract would be simple: vote no, cameras come down. It wasn't. City emails obtained by 404 Media through a public records request show weeks of back-and-forth after the city council decided to stop using Flock's three automated license plate readers. Flock told city employees not to remove the equipment themselves, and a company representative admitted uncertainty about whether the cameras could even be shut off remotely.

With no clear answer and no cameras coming down, Verona improvised. City workers covered the three units in black plastic trash bags, a low-tech fix for a problem the vendor wouldn't solve. It's part of a pattern 404 Media has documented in other cities that voted to cut ties with Flock and then found themselves stuck waiting, unsure if they had the legal standing to physically pull the hardware or disable its recording on their own.

The emails also show a Flock work order that scheduled maintenance on the Verona cameras rather than removal, which is not exactly the fix a city council expecting deactivation would want. Mayor Luke Diaz told the Wisconsin Examiner back in February that repeated requests to Flock went nowhere. "They weren't removing them," he said, adding that covering the cameras felt like the safest option available to stop them from "spying on people." He said he was certain the units kept working even after the contract had technically ended.

A Flock spokesperson gave 404 Media an explanation for the delay: Verona chose not to renew its contract instead of canceling outright mid-term, which the company says accounts for the gap between the city's expectations and what actually happened. Whatever the technical distinction, the emails make clear that city officials wanted the cameras gone fast, and that Flock's own process didn't move at the pace the town wanted, or needed.

My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting

A city council votes to stop surveilling its own residents and still can't get the cameras removed for weeks without duct-taping trash bags over them — that's not a contract dispute, that's a company that built itself as landlord over municipal infrastructure it doesn't actually own. Any town signing up with one of these vendors should demand a hard exit clause with a real deadline, in writing, before the first camera goes up, not after the council changes its mind.

Read more about this at: 404 Media

Related stories

The daily briefing

Every AI story that matters, in your inbox by 8am.

TLDRocket reads all relevant sources, removes duplicate coverage, and summarises the day in two minutes. Follow companies and topics for alerts, or get the briefing in Slack. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.