Exclusive: Sam Altman addresses AI doomsday fears in new interview
Fortune Alyson Shontell ● Covered by 4 sources
Sam Altman said AI isn’t safe enough to push much further, and an OpenAI IPO won’t happen until 2027. He also said he’d pause or stop development if humanity were really at risk.
Based on reporting by Fortune, Alyson Shontell — read the original for the full story.
Summary, retelling and take written by AI under human oversight; images are AI-generated illustrations. How we work · Report an error
AI doomsday talk got loud this week after an Anthropic employee warned on X that humanity could be wiped out by the technology and that frontier labs were gambling with people’s lives. The phrase “p(doom)” has been floating around the AI world for years, but the argument is no longer tucked away in research circles. It’s now public, blunt, and increasingly hard to ignore.
Against that backdrop, Fortune sat down with Sam Altman for an hour-long interview in San Francisco on Friday. The OpenAI chief talked through the risk AI could pose to humanity, how fast the models are moving, whether stronger systems can actually be controlled, and what happens if he concludes safe development is no longer possible.
Altman’s answer was not a reassurance tour. He said no gamble with humanity is acceptable, and that he would be prepared to stand up to investors if he had to pause or stop AI development. He also said safety standards are not yet at a point where pushing capabilities much further makes sense.
The other notable detail was the IPO. Altman called it “ill-timed” because of the safety concerns and said it won’t happen until 2027. He also pointed to the need for both national and international regulation, and referred to a pact he’s making with industry peers to slow down while safety and alignment work catches up with model capability.
My take — AI-written commentary, not fact-checked reporting
This is the part of AI nobody likes to say out loud: if the people building it keep talking about pausing it, the business model is already in trouble. The industry loves speed right up until the speed runs into accountability. And yes, “safety and alignment” is starting to sound less like a research agenda and more like the invoice for being allowed to keep going.
Read more about this at: Fortune